Estradiol delivered via a skin patch over two years
has no harmful effect on cognitive abilities or
health-related quality of life.
A study led by researchers at the San Francisco VA
Medical Center has shown that extremely low doses
of estrogen had no ill effects on the cognitive
abilities or general health of older women over
the course of two years.
"This is exciting. It shows that women can take
estrogen safely," observes lead author Kristine
Yaffe, MD, chief of geriatric
psychiatry
at SFVAMC and associate professor of psychiatry,
neurology, and epidemiology at the University of
California, San Francisco.
In 2004, study results from the Women's Health
Initiative (WHI), a nationwide longitudinal study
sponsored by the National Institutes of Health,
indicated that estrogen was associated with an
increased risk of dementia among women 65 and
older, as well as with an increased risk of heart
attack and stroke.
"Those results raised a lot of doubts about whether
women should be taking estrogen at all," Yaffe
notes.
The current study, published in the July 2006 issue
of Archives of Neurology, looked specifically at
the potential effects of estrogen on cognitive
abilities and quality of life. A group of 417
post-menopausal women aged 60 to 80 were randomly
assigned to receive a daily .014 milligram dose of
either estradiol, a form of estrogen, or a placebo
through a skin patch for two years. The women were
given a battery of standardized cognitive tests
and a test of health-related quality of life at
the beginning of the study, after one year, and
after two years.
At the end of the study, there was no difference
between the two groups in either cognitive
abilities or health-related quality of life.
"The results are very reassuring, because it
suggests that women can use this patch without
harm for two years," says Yaffe. "It would benefit
their bones and might have a beneficial effect in
terms of hot flashes."
A related study of the same group of women showed a
significant increase in bone density, without
adverse health effects, in the women who took
estradiol compared to the women who took placebo.
The current study was a pre-planned secondary
investigation.
Yaffe speculates that the differences in health and
cognition outcomes between these two studies and
the WHI studies could be related to three factors:
dose, type of estrogen, and means of delivery.
The women in the WHI studies received .625
milligrams per day of conjugated estrogen - a
mixture of estrogen from several different sources
- in pill form. In contrast, the women studied by
Yaffe and her associates received a daily dose of
estradiol - pure human estrogen - that was over 44
times smaller and delivered through a skin patch.
"The different between a patch and a pill is
significant because medications taken in pill form
are processed through the liver before they reach
the bloodstream," explains Yaffe. "It's thought
that estrogen in pill form might stimulate the
liver to produce substances that can lead to
clotting or other adverse side effects. With a
patch, you bypass the liver and go straight to the
blood."
Yaffe notes that since the WHI results were
announced in 2004, "the field of estrogen research
has been stymied. Hopefully, this study will start
to turn the tide."
----------------------------
Article adapted by Medical News Today from
original press release.
----------------------------
Coauthors of the study are Eric Vittinghoff, PhD,
of UCSF; Kristine E. Ensrud, MD, MPH, of the
University of Minnesota and the Minneapolis VA
Medical Center; Karen C. Johnson, MD, MPH, of the
University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center;
Susan Diem, MD, MPH, of UM; Vladmir Hanes, MD, of
Berlex, Inc.; and Deborah Grady, MD, MPH, of
SFVAMC and UCSF.
The research was funded by Berlex, Inc., with
partial support from the National Institute of
Aging.
SFVAMC has the largest medical research program in
the national VA system, with more than 200
research scientists, all of whom are faculty
members at UCSF.
UCSF is a leading university that consistently
defines health care worldwide by conducting
advanced biomedical research, educating graduate
students in the life sciences, and providing
complex patient care.
Contact: Steve Tokar
University of California - San
Francisco